Of all the commonly and typically used colors, pink both overwhelms and escapes me. On one hand, with a one-year-old daughter, pink seems to be everywhere: Room décor, baby paraphernalia, a few toys and especially clothing. Of course, if I had a boy, pink would absolutely not even be an option, something I am reminded of every time Maya is dressed in anything but pink, be it red, blue or orange with people asking for details regarding my son — thank goodness she now has earrings. So, I wonder, can’t we at least share and divide colors equally? It would be fairly easy, for example: Penis team gets blue, red and purple; Vagina team gets pink, green and brown.
On the other hand, as a graphic designer, I find a lack of pink in my job. It’s a color corporations, organizations or products, either business-to-business or business-to-consumer usually shy away from due to its female and girly connotations. So the modus operandi is that little boys are not “allowed” to use pink and corporations “choose” not to use pink. Or was the choice made for them by our ongoing stereotyping of pink? In doing a little research I am reminded that it used to be different:“There has been a great diversity of opinion on the subject, but the generally accepted rule is pink for the boy and blue for the girl. The reason is that pink being a more decided and stronger color is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.”
— Ladies Home Journal, June, 1918
While several theories circulate as to how, when and why pink and blue were reverted, the change happened with the end of World War II, as women were targeted with everything pink: Lipstick, appliances and cars. Barbie’s birth soon after only reinforced the issue. So why is it that in a co-ed world we have such defined color associations? And how healthy is this?
With a corporate spectrum dominated by blue, I can’t help but wonder how the increasing globality of these companies is affecting the use of color across borders—thus affecting how pink is perceived with each generational change in the different parts of the world. Could we at least let pink be a part of a secondary palette, by letting go of these unhealthy strong convictions that limit us? Or should we be adding pink to a “soon to be extinct” list?
I'm not a girly-girl at all. When I was kid I shunned all things pink, but now I'm starting to like the color again. I have a few pieces of clothing with splashes of pink on them, and I own a pink Nintendo DS. It's not because I'm becoming "girly", but because I think that pink is just a good color.
Pink is extremely versatile, depending on what shade you choose, and it goes well with a lot of other colors. I think designers are missing out on good color choices by shying away from pink. Of course part of the reason, which you mentioned, is the "girly" connotations the color has, but if it's used in more varied applications, would that change? I see a lot of blue in logos for tech companies, and I'm personally getting sick of that color.
Pink shirts were very popular for men in the 1950s, and (cherry blossom) pink is still considered a masculine color in Japan.
A very good book to read about how pink became a "woman's color" is "Pink Think" by Lynn Peril. It's one of my favorite advertising analysis books.
On Jul.17.2008 at 10:08 AM