Great link Armin and great discussion Jason.
The thing that I have always found perplexing is that givin all we know about marketing and branding, why can't movies be consistently represented graphically. I am sure they would benefit from "recognizeability".
Often times a movies teaser poster, official release poster, title graphics, web site and video/dvd cover are COMPLETELY different. ARRGHGHGH! What is that? Its mind boggling especially when the posters are done really well like the original Being John Malkovich One Sheet which was brilliant but was never carried over into the video or title graphics.
Is there no pride in the work? For all the money and time that is spent into making these 2 hour fantasies, you'd think that pure pride in the finished product would be the motivation to package it properly.
I Heart Huckabees was a recent example where the "branding" was carried through all stages of media. Maybe it doesn't really matter to the average joe but it makes me feel warm and fuzzy.
On May.03.2005 at 09:44 AMmy favorite poster of recent memory:
Of course, it should be noted, the only time I get to the movies these days is when there's something the 3-year old wants to see.
It worked well as an 8ft teaser wall poster (the way I saw it) without the logo on the bottom.
(OK, I admit it...I wanted to see this movie too...)
On May.03.2005 at 09:50 AMthis is a good site.
there's also somethinghere. sounds like the bloke hasn't got a clue what he's talking about. "transcending the form of the film poster to become social commentary." rubbish.
On May.03.2005 at 10:00 AMAs a kid, I loved John Berkey's King Kong poster; perhaps more than Jessica Lange. Years later some friends, the wife and I would spend the middle of each May on a Mexican beach — always at the same time as Jessica, Sam Shepard and family. Needless to say, my opinion reversed.
On May.03.2005 at 12:38 PMI'm curious to see how they launch the campaign for the next version, done by Peter Jackson. King Kong has such tradition, they've got to do something big.
On May.03.2005 at 12:42 PMThese days, a movie makes or breaks within the first two, maybe three weeks from opening. The average movie lasts less than six weeks in a theatre before getting pulled.
So it's no wonder that studios have become incredibly risk adverse when it comes to a movie's promotional materials.
Forget creativity, forget artistic intent, forget cryptic conceptualization. Movie posters have become nothing more than ads. Giant, formulaic, quick-read ads. And like trailers, movie posters are depended upon to pull in as many viewers as possible, as quickly as possible. High-impact, star-power, grippy catchline is all that matters.
And you can be sure that the posters have probably been tested numerous times in front of focus groups until every square inch of it has been deemed acceptable for public consumption.
Given that, it's sometimes amazing how a poster like Ocean's Eleven (the better one IMHO) or Ocean's Twelve gets through.
Not surprisingly, the most interesting posters often come from no-name indies or foreign imports. They don't have big names and aren't easily summarized into a six word tagline. Course, they don't generate hundreds of millions of dollars either.
Here's another old set of twins that bothered me when they came out...even the typefaces are similar. The movies are totally unrelated to one another.
On May.03.2005 at 01:01 PMAnother rare catch I left out.
Not a typical one-sheet.
On May.03.2005 at 04:54 PMI got so damned frustrated with the posters for my favorite flicks that I started designing my own. I've loved Heat more and more over the past 7,000 times I've watched it, and for as deep a movie as it is, the poster has always sucked. Same for The Thin Red Line.
I had forgotten all about Corey's site--some of his posters are better than the movies they promote. Love the Pearl Harbor series. And that movie sucked worse than Heat's poster sucked.
On May.03.2005 at 05:54 PMHere are a few posters that are pretty cool (at least in my opinion)::
Well this movie poster is, well, simply Outrageous!!!
I REALLY REALLY like this poster. The only thing i would change would be left aligning the very bottom credits.
Then there is this version of Suspiria though may just be partial to the dancer with blood pooling off of her legs (oh that is so beautiful). The type layout is better on the first poster, but i included this one to show the detail of the woman. The third one is a cool solution to a sequal poster.
On May.04.2005 at 01:07 AM
There is some audience interaction for ya. :0)
Again with the checkerboard. (I LOVE this movie)
p.s. is there a way to get e-mails when there has been responses to the threads?
On May.04.2005 at 01:11 AM>Palindromes
Nice one, Jason. Reminds me a little of another past poster I liked....
...which leads me to Burton's latest summer flick...
...which isn't bad, but is kinda dull when you consider the possibilities of what it could've been.
This third one is a little expected, but I think is kinda dark and cool for a mainstream blockbuster...
course, one of the most eagerly awaited movie this summer is Terry Gilliam's The Brothers Grimm, which has not yet released a poster. I hope it doesn't disappoint.
And cool posters, Candy. Welcome to SpeakUp.
On May.04.2005 at 02:22 AMOf course no examination of movie posters is valid without a reminder of the Polish masters of the genre. Check out my modest gallery I made for inspiration on a rainy way. Poster Gallery
Also one my favorites from the last 10 years was for Gun Van Sants Psycho remake. Very Striking.
On May.04.2005 at 09:28 AMOhhh. That Psycho one, I almost forgot about it. And, Tan, I didn't know Gilliam was doing Grimm. Hopefully, the movie'll be good, as well as the poster.
On May.04.2005 at 10:22 AMI have nothing to add, except ... what a great selection of posters and sites. Thanks for the thread, Jason.
On May.04.2005 at 02:28 PMCome on, Marian. Not even a poster from last year you liked or hated?
On May.04.2005 at 02:51 PM
Good roundup Jason. I rarely find movie posters to be engaging. They are attention-grabbing but rarely fulfilling. There is usually nothing to discover. Which, I guess, is not the ultimate goal of a movie poster.
Some of the most interesting movie posters I have seen are in Corey Holms' web site. A good portion of his posters are just comps, never seeing the light of day but they show what non-literal movie posters could be. And I'm sure there are thousands of other great posters tucked away in archival CDs. It's a shame that they get so marketized.
Did I already mention Posterwire? Yes. Okay: Posterwire — good.
On May.03.2005 at 09:21 AM