Change of fools …
Ive been meaning to write this post for months. But after the bison coin, then that Adidas stamp turned up in recent Quipsologies, I knew it was time to get this article finished and posted. Then I got scooped by Richard Zeid and his money post. Was it a scoop? Or was it serendipity? …
I dont spend a lot of time in the US, so when I was down there recently I was surprised to find these quarters in my change:
Yes, old hat to you, as theyve been out for a few years, but my perception has always been that Americans are a little funny about their money: It has an iconic status that yall seem very reluctant to fuck with. (And yes, I think that there is a closer relationship between the appearance of your money and your culture/world imagecall it a Brand, if you willthan other countries have.)
In Canada we have our standard series of circulation coins, which originated in 1937 (and are still minted today). I consider these acceptable coins, athough design-wise they bear little relationship to each other. I’ve always been fond of that beaver, but the typography on the quarter and the dime are quite nice.
Then, in 1967 we got our first (in my living memory) alternate series with the Centennial coins, by artist Alex Colville, which remain our most beautifully designed set to date. Simple, well-rendered artwork, uniformly framed by some decent type. (How hard can it be?)
In 1973 we got the RCMP centennial quarter, but we started seriously messing with our coinage in 1992, when we issued our 125th Anniversary monthly coin series, featuring one of each of our 10 provinces (+ 2 territories) each month.
After that all hell broke loose at the Royal Canadian Mint, and weve been issuing so many variations of the quarter, in particular, that I pity the poor tourists trying to make sense of their change. Basically, a quarter is a round thing the same size as an American quarter, with some version of the Queen (or reigning Monarch)s head on one side and pretty much anything on the other. Since the relatively attractive provincial series of ‘92, it has been a fast and slippery slope to graphic hell, with coin design succumbing to that now all-too-familiar contest.
Over 1999 and 2000, the Mint issued at least 24 new quarter designs: one for each month over the 2 years. This has netted us the usual array of voyageurs and pioneers …
… and some fairly decent art-inspired designs (I genuinely like the one on the right, from pictographs, and heres another nice one).
But there is an unfortunate mass of coins from what appears to be randomly computer-generated patriotism. This is what you get when you dial nationalism, flag, monument, people holding hands (and, in the case of the first one here, Mussolini) into the instamatic coin generating machine:
Then of course, theres the ever-popular kiddie-drawing; of which we have at least 4. There is one hideous piece of [oh! excuse me!] which has always looked to me suspiciously as though it was drawn in CorelDraw! The following at least began in crayon:
The Royal Canadian Mint has an excellent web site by the way, and to view the full set of monthly contest winners of 1999, go here and choose each month from the drop down menu.
For the 2000 quarters, go here. Or, for a more opinionated view, here.
Given that it must cost … er … a mint to issue new coins, Ive long wondered why we keep doing this. But it seems to be a crowd-pleaser, and the Mint seems to be in the business of manufacturing souvenirs and collectables, more than issuing currency.
Oddly, we havent changed the beaver on the nickle since 1967. Being our national animal, perhaps its image is sacrosanct. Its mostly the quarter which has become the canvas for our national exhuberance, although the dime, the loonie ($1) and toonie ($2) coins are not without their variants.
Speaking of which, what do Americans do when they need chocolate money? How do you live without dollar coins? (The one on lower left is a real coin; the other 2 are foil-wrapped chocolate. Not bad, eh?)
(An aside, and personal beef of mine, is that modern-day minting is far inferior to that of the earlier coins. An old penny, even now after years of use will often still have a deeper, sharper impression than a current coin, which tend to look about as well made as … chocolate money.)
The other incredibly exciting thing about Canadian coins (and, of course the coins of any country which portray a living person), is watching the Monarch age (or change) across time. Queen E has been around a long time but it wasnt so long ago that King George VI, and even George V coins were in common circulation, and they do still turn up from time to time.
Interestingly, they’ve removed the Queen’s crown in the recent issue. Now she’s just an old lady. Very symbolic. More monarchy watching here.
OK, but heres the revolution in coin design, invented by our very own Royal Canadian Mint. Colour. Yes, folks, those inventive Canadians have figured out a way to print colour onto coins (albeit as crude as a jailhouse tattoo), and the result is this quarter (enlarged for your viewing pleasure):
The Poppy Quarter is remarkable for one other reason as well. When it was issued, it was available only at one location … no, not a bank, and not from the Mint or any other government institution, but from … Tim Hortons. Thats a donut shop (a Canadian donut shop, mind you). This from the Mint’s press release last October:
Imagine the possiblities from here. Coloured coins and corporate sponsorship together could pave a whole new era in coin design.
God have mercy.
…………………….
All of the above are circulation coins: i.e. coins minted for general use and circulation, and do not include special collector editions, of which there are many. My research also led me to this Santa coin, which I have not heard a thing about previously.
As well I ran across this special-edition coin. You want colour? We got colour. That’s a hologram, darlings. See it and weep.
Marian,
It's spelled "color", eh?
On Mar.17.2005 at 04:12 AM