The promise was big:
“Gain will demonstrate the value of designing as a strategic process that adds substantial value to business and organizations. Influential designers and visionary business leaders will describe how they have initiated fundamental change in their organizations, their industries, their product mix and their bottom line by making design part of their culture. Presentations will provide both designer and corporate views on the process and consequence of value created through fostering new knowledge, generating better ideas, cooperation, increased goodwill, effective problem solving, collaboration, community vitality, and, of course, beauty, effectiveness and ROI.”
Personally, I always prefer the AIGA design + business events over the pure design presentations. I don’t need to see another presentation where a designer gets up on stage, shows his/her work to an audience… “see how great I am” .. with the audience reacting “…oh I want to be just like him/her one day”… it just does not give me much. The design + business conferences on the other hand, usually offer a chance to pick up new thinking, new tools, new understanding that I believe I can apply to how I conduct business, how I might adjust my strategies in my work.
Yes, the design + business conference costs money, but I believe the investment more than pays for itself. Yes, you might be able to pick-up a book or two and get many of the discussed concepts, but there is a dynamic in a lecture or presentation that cannot be delivered in a book.
While Gain did not necessarily fullfill the promise as outlined above completely, I think the conference did deliver. As with any conference there are always highlights and lowlights. I did not attend every presentation therefore I can’t judge them all, but I feel I caught plenty to ponder on. Plus one of the great things about this conference was the networking opportunities, and the connecting with friends that I had met at other events before. The web-based networking system in place was an interesting approach to help participants connect with each other. It seemed much like a dating network, but people sure were driven to the macs in the member lounge to find participants with shared interests.
Speaker hightlights for me included
Larry Keeley
Innovation strategist, The Doblin Group
Keeley showed that if design professionals don’t want to become a commodity they have to look in the future, figure out how they can position themselves to be the shapers of a new design landscape… who wants to compete for $25 logo jobs or $260 per page websites?
—-
James Ales
Art director, Monterey Bay Aquarium
Jim Ales demonstrated how supporting a dynamic organization with an energetic and intelligent visual brand can generate a profitable response.
This guy, in my opinion, pulled off a great presentation. His presentation was simple, but had depth. He showed samples of his work for the aquarium, why it worked, what kind of a response it triggers (in $ for donations) week after week. but most of all he brought an emotion to the stage that I have not seen for quite some time. What a nice surprise.
—-
David Brancaccio
Co-host, “NOW with Bill Moyers”
Not one of the speakers, but as moderator essential in shaping dialogue and making connections. What a difference a good moderator makes. David was smart, quick and just an excellent guide troughout the program.
—-
Patrick Whitney
Director, Institute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology
Patrick Whitley showed how they use research to come up with better strategies and stronger solutions. He showed how it works in theory and then showed how it worked in an acual project. Very smart. Very well presented.
Lowlights included
Sir Paul Judge
Chairman, Royal Society of Arts
If I’m not mistaken, this guy, Sir Paul, was one of the keynote speakers. What happened? The brit forgot that he was presenting to design professionals. There might have been something to what he said, but the way he presented it was an embarassment. Makes you wonder how he made it onto the bill. But it also showed how much value design could really add.
—-
Paula Scher
Partner, Pentagram
In the middle of her talk, a completely uncalled-for low-blow at the UPS logo. The presentation itself I would rate mediocre at best. Actually, not even that… “make a friend high up in the foodchain of your customer’s firm” and “clients are evil”… Haven’t we all heard that too many times before… I certainly did not hear an explanation on how to explain to ordinary people how extraordinary design can be. But that’s what I think she was supposed to show us.
—
Ivy Ross with panelists from three design firms
Executive vice president of design and development, Old Navy
Again, a presentation that maybe had good intentions, but it missed its mark by putting on a lousy show. While it showcased that there are exciting possibilities there for designers to capitalize on with their ideas — if they just believe in what they are doing and realize the potential. Other than Scott Flora, none of them seemed convincing in what they had to say/show.
—
What made this conference special to me was a combination of things: Good speakers, good conversations, good venue, seing old friends, good bars (…) a dinner with some good Speak Up friends.
update: thanks to kirian, here the link to the
Gain Resources
Gods, that first paragraph reads like something from the dot-com era... what year is it, 1997? I think there's a "paradigm shift" or two missing in there...
On Oct.21.2004 at 06:19 AM