A little bit like the Walgreens logo discussion, I would now like to address RE/MAX’s hideous excuse for logo, logotype and overall crappy look. I have learned my lesson and I now know not to ask for a redesign purely based on looks. But the issue remains the same — a leader in its industry working under a [subjectively] ugly looking brand.
What does the hot air balloon mean anyway? Have you seen their latest TV ads, with the huge real estate people walking through the neighborhood? Fre-e-e-aky.
I’m also not asking for a full redesign, I would be humored if only they got rid of this little piece of the E after the slash… that’s all I would ask for.
So, seriously, would RE/MAX be up for a nice retouching? I would not commend a complete redesign — a nice, simple fast forward to the 21st century could be beneficial for them.
the logo reminds me of herb lubalin's avantgarde gone 80's petrol company (seems like that blue bar is attacking the E)
and all in all it looks crap
but what does the company do? are they good and honest at it, is the customers happy, how do they influence our culture and our ecosystem .. do they really deserve to look "good" ?
i'm asking caus im european and i don't know the brand. and i feel that you (we) often give aestetic facelifts to hideous companies.. like giving facelifts and boob-jobs to bad actresses so they can keep getting away with making crap movies for us..
shouldnt we evaluate wether the companies deserve to look good ?
On Jun.24.2003 at 09:19 AM