One of the main reasons I like going to the movies is to see the opening credits. All that big type is just so… big and nice and crisp and pretty and…
This site has a huge compilation of movie titles including:
- Pablo Ferro’s Dr. Strangelove
- Imaginary Force’s Seven
- P. Scott Makela’s Fight Club
- Saul Bass’ Psycho
And many, many more.
Still on topic, but picking at a specific example... did anyone who saw the trailer (and matching promo posters and Web site) for Signs and then watched the actual film get a bit bummed after the movie started?
The trailers used a crop-circle, clock-hand rotation on the primitive letter "g" in the film's title. When I first saw it, I was really impressed and the execution worked quite well with the dramatic feeling the teasers had. Like the somewhat vague trailers, the typography said a lot without saying anything.
>
In contrast, the actual film used a very nice serif to display the main info on the movie (title, actors, director, etc.)... not the look previously used in the trailers. It was complemented by a very memorable score. (Some critics even compared it to Psycho's opening). It wasn't distasteful, but it also wasn't what I expected so I was a bit disappointed at first. However, if I was to be objective and rate them on their own merits, the typesetting -- albeit a little boring -- worked in conjunction with the music to build the suspense. Which, I suppose, could be what they were aiming for.
But considering that they had something really clever to work with, I was surprised to see the trailers' use of type thrown to the wayside when it came to creating the movie's opening credits.
Did anyone else notice this change between the trailer and movie opening credits? Perhaps there is an industry reasoning behind this aside from what I guessed at above, but I still find it peculiar.
On Oct.15.2002 at 09:42 AM