Since August, I’ve been traveling almost every month to do a lecture outside of New York. Hampton Roads in Virginia, Ypsilanti in Michigan, Cleveland in Ohio, and Nashville in Tennessee. All wonderful experiences and great audiences. What has stood out in all these visits is a recurring question from young designers and students: Do I have to be in New York to have the best experience and the most opportunities as a graphic designer?
To an extent, I answer yes. The ridiculous amount of graphic design firms in the city provide a consistent stream of employment opportunities if you are looking for a job, and the number of potential clients available to those looking to start their own firm or a freelance career is nearly infinite, not to mention the inherent amount of visual stimuli that there is everywhere. And, of course, there is the large design community and endless barrage of design-related events and venues. Graphic design living in New York is indeed a great experience and provides ample opportunities. But…
With New York, there is always a “but.” So, yes, New York is great but you have to be able to stomach the high price of living, the fast pace, the competitiveness, the noise, the crowds, the small apartments, the summer heat, the winter cold, the crippling of the subway system with just the slightest increase of normal rain or snow, and a number of other idiosyncrasies that, for the most part, New Yorkers see as badges of honor and representative of the lifestyle they (we) have chosen.
I’m sure the same applies to cities like San Francisco and London, and to a lesser extent Chicago, Seattle or Minneapolis. So, what’s the right balance for a design city? How much hustle and bustle is necessary to thrive? Or how much serenity is needed to not go insane? If you are an employee, what do you look for in a city? If you are a design firm owner, large or small, what do you look for? Does a smaller market mean smaller clients or have PDFs, e-mail and web-based conferencing killed these limitations? Where you at? And what do you like about it?
While this may only be the beginning in a possibly-inevitable stream of city apologetics, I can't help but notice that each of the NYC "cons" you mention are (in a way) void in Minneapolis. The cost of living (particularly rent), especially compared to other large US metropolitan centers, is shockingly and disproportionately low. While the public transit system isn't anywhere near as robust as other metros, it's one of the few -- only? -- remaining metros of its size where getting around by car is realistic and dependable. It's statistically bizarre that the '07 bridge collapse happened in the Twin Cities, because really, the infrastructure and planning in that area is overwhelmingly smart -- not least of which during the winters, where all the functions of doing life (walking, shopping, driving, commuting) have been engineered over decades to withstand the cold. Summers are temperate, and stunning.
Then come the pros: The arts, illustration/comics, crafts, and design scenes are rooted, expansive, and growing. The design agencies are solid (Duffy, CSA), and the numerous ad agencies hire great work. Multiple design schools and galleries dot the map, and the cultural attitudes are historically -- and -- reliably progressive and arts-friendly.
One hell of a good design city, really.
On Oct.15.2008 at 10:10 AM