Recently a job applicant came in for an interview. The usual small talk. The review of the portfolio. The questions from both sides. The promise to consider the situation and to get back to each other.
The portfolio was okay. It was not outstanding. But the work was decent. Showed potential. Some pieces were really good. Others okay. Some seemed to be fillers and a good edit would have been helpful. There was good attitude and personality in the work. Plus the applicant had the verbal communication skills that so often seem to be lacking. I’ll take that over any high-polished portfolio.
With certainty the applicant went through similar motions about the pros and cons of a potential employer.
While not looking to hire, I considered to make an offer. However, I didn’t have to. We didn’t even have a conversation about it. The deal-breaker was location. The applicant, fully intending to move to Los Angeles, did not feel comfortable in the city, reconsidered options, changed plans and took a job on the east coast.
While I believe that the “location issue” could have been researched prior to applying for a job, i still think it was the right move by the applicant and I applaud the decision. After all, starting a new job is hard — why not do it in a location and environment one feels most comfortable in.
i've finally realized the value of interviewing the company as much as they're interviewing you... it matters so much how comfortable you are with your surroundings. i'm learning the hard way that i not only prefer an urban setting and larger design teams - i'm learning that i actually produce more and better in that setting.
On Jul.18.2005 at 08:30 PM