After the heated discussion on Designspeak I thought I would try and make my first post in a while something memorably deep and theoretical. But in the process of working on a poster for an upcoming competition, I came across Rene Wanner’s poster page which completely blew me away. Hopefully some of you have seen it before, but for those that haven’t, it is quite a treat.
As graphic designers, poster design is often seen as the closest we can come to making “art”. For most of us (I presume) it is a rare opportunity that we delight in and strive for. It also tends to ask for quite a different approach from the minutiae of day to day design work. What have your experiences of designing posters been like and how have you approached the task? Does the difference of scale and added freedom result in work that you are generally more excited about, and in the end, are more pleased with? And finally, as we move away from the poster as the primary commercial/public interface, if it is an artform, is it a dying one?
I think there is something about that one big piece of paper that is really freeing. And somehow it seems like clients are more willing to go with the creative process than with any other form. They seem to expect that we'll think differently for the poster--or at least that has been my experience.
I love posters, and I don't think it's a dying art form. When it comes to posters I have no defined preference for style. I love them when they're witty, simple, complicated, illustrated, illegible, readable, gratuitous, 1- 2- 13-colours. I don't know what it is, but I think I like more posters than I dislike. That's weird. Maybe I'm only noticing the ones I like. That's probably it.
On Mar.11.2004 at 09:55 PM